Fahrenheit 451 Vs. Looking Backward - 1560 Words

Fahrenheit 451 vs. Looking Backward In any society, there are bound to be flaws. In both Looking Backward by Edward Bellamy and Fahrenheit 451 written by Ray Bradbury, major flaws of humanity are highlighted. Both authors discuss many issues we face, and offer ways to improve these issues. Bradbury suggests that society is too conformed, and the government is being hypocritical by telling us to fear a community in which everything is the same while facilitating that very type of place. Everyone in this cookie cutter world that Bradbury describes is identical. He suggests that the solution to this would be to let everyone live the way they want, with the freedom to be themselves and express their opinions. Bellamy argues that in our†¦show more content†¦Many people were unhappy, but chose to live a life of ignorance in order to protect themselves from the harms of the world, and to please the authority. Montag, the protagonist, was perhaps the most unhappy of all, thinking t o himself, â€Å"he was not happy. He was not happy. He said the words to himself. He recognized this as the true state of affairs† (Bradbury, 9). The underlying meaning of his writing could be interpreted as a jab at communism, considering he wrote his novel in 1953 which was during the early beginnings of the Cold War against the Soviet Union. Communism can be defined as a theory advocating for a culture in which all property is publicly owned and each person is given a rationed pay according to their needs. In Bradbury’s futuristic utopia, people have no privacy and everyone is brainwashed into thinking the same thing. When comparing communism with Bradbury’s society, the similarities are evident. During the Cold War, anyone associated with communism would be scrutinized and excluded from the community, because those were the people who wanted to conform under the government. Bradbury is criticizing a power force that encourages a lack of classes and his prop osed solution is to let the people earn what they deserve. While Bradbury believed that people should not conform under the government rules, Bellamy most likely would have thought that communism would have been a

Alternative Energy Engineering Degree Scholarship Essay

Essays on Alternative Energy Engineering Degree Scholarship Essay The paper "Alternative Energy Engineering Degree" is an excellent example of a scholarship essay on education. Everything needs energy. Cars, our homes, and the workplace all depend on energy to run engines and provide electric for electronics. Much of our energy today comes from fossil fuels that are non-renewable and pollute the environment. One of the greatest challenges we face today is figuring out how to provide the energy that provides for modern society while not burning fossil fuels that will run out and will pollute our planet. Engineering new ways, alternative ways of providing this energy is the professional goal I have set for myself.Currently, I am pursuing a two-year degree in Alternative Energy Engineering. I believe that getting this knowledge will give me the chance to get a good job that will help me make a difference in the world. The engineering aspect of developing alternative energy technology is appealing to me. I am not an inventor, so I do not want to work a s the person that invents the new photovoltaic cell or figures out how to better capture hydrogen for use in a fuel cell. What I am determined to do is to take these inventions that other people discover and then figure out how to apply the science in the real world.I believe that I deserve this scholarship because I am a determined, hard-working individual that has a plan for how to make the world a better place. I have always worked hard in school and have gotten good grades. I believe that this scholarship will allow me to study something in school that will improve my community and provides a good job.

Before 1640, parliament was no Essay Example For Students

Before 1640, parliament was no Essay Before 1640, parliament was not powerful and it did not contain anopposition. Discuss. There are two schools of thought concerning parliamentary power and opposition prior to 1640. The older Whig ideal argues that Parliament was indeed powerful, and contained opposition to the government, i.e. the Crown, because a power struggle ensued, while the Revisionist faction denounces this view of a power struggle between Crown and Parliament. it is important that two key words are defined (Chambers dictionary); powerful will be known as having great power and force, while opposition will be regarded as the parliamentary body that opposes the government, i.e. the Crown. The Revisionist critique that Parliament did not contain opposition and was not powerful has many followers with many of the recent historians, such as Loades, Sharpe and Russell. Their argument stands on shaky ground. The three reigns prior to the Civil war (greatest power struggle of all time) were littered with Parliamentary opposition and power struggle. The more viable Whig argument states that Parliament was indeed powerful and contained vast opposition against the Crown. With two contradicting ideals, Elizabeth and her prerogatives over the matters of state (religion, foreign policy, marriage, succession and finance) in which Parliament couldnt discuss without her consent. Parliament having the contradictory view that it was their privilege and right to discuss these matters. The era of Elizabeth is a chronological chart of parliamentary opposition. 1566, a petition from Parliament over her marriage, Elizabeth ordered them to stop this debate because it was a matters of state, Wentworth reacted to this by saying this was a breach of the liberty of the free speech of the House. Elizabeth, strongly as possible; let this my discipline stand you in stead of sorer strokes, never tempt too far a princes patience, a warning to Parliament that they should not oppose her wishes. There were many instances in which the Queen had to rebuke Pa rliament for infringing her prerogatives, 1572 where a passing of a Bill concerning Mary Queen of Scots was delayed because Parliament were indulging in other matters, the Queen gave them this message the Queen Majestys pleasure is that this House do proceed in weighty causes, laying aside all private matters. Constitutionally parliament had not gained any extra power, but by their actions they had gained important precedents which was detrimental to the struggles of future monarchs. The impeachment of Wentworth set an important precedent, this proves to be decisive in James and Charles reign. The question of free speech within Parliamentary sessions, it is true that she denounced many of their debates over the matters of state, but many of these debates led to actions such as the monopoly abuse, in which parliament originally ordered an investigation, but the Queen stepped in and ordered it herself, reminding her dutiful and loving subjects that they must not entrench her prerogati ves. This again left another precedent in which parliament could directly form a constitution or redress a grievances by investigating it themselves. James inherited a Parliament with a new ideal and the means to follow this. Parliament gained new precedents from Elizabeths reign which they would use against James, as well as the rise of new power hungry Councillors. Parliament was seen as the standard bearer for common law, and they saw James as the potential enemy.James a king who entrusted upon divinity as he explained; Kings are not only Gods lieutenants on earth and sit upon Gods throne, but by even God himself they are called Gods.. Sir Edwin Sandys remarked in 1614 our impositions increase in England as it come to be almost a tyrannical government.. Within each session, parliament opposed James policies; such as the Unification of Scotland England, in which Parliament rejected because of their xenophobic attitude, the Great Contract in which James was willing to give up certain prerogatives in return for an annual subsidy of 200,000, but it was rejected, the attempted impeachment of Buckingham. Parliament began to extend th eir prerogatives and privileges. James enjoyed debates, which led to the rise of parliamentary power by allowing free debate in the House this led to a precedent to free speech. James argued that the

The Literary World free essay sample

An analysis of the literary work of writers, Hawthorne and Irving. An analysis of the work of Nathaniel Hawthorne and Irving and the descriptions that both authors use. The author compares Hawthornes depiction of the Puritan city and Irvings depiction of the country. The author compares the writings and different literary worlds of these two famous writers. Nathaniel Hawthornes novel 1850 novel The Scarlet Letter and Washington Irvings short story The Legend of Sleepy Hollow (published in 1819-20) are two of the most important and influential works of American 19th century fiction. Despite their many differences in form, content and style, they share one essential commonality: They both helped to create an essentially American style of writing that focused on subjects and characters who were undeniably and unmistakably American. This paper explores the form and style of these two works, emphasizing the ways in which these two writers each underscored the national concerns of his time. We will write a custom essay sample on The Literary World or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page